5 Special Considerations for Live Cell Imaging

Live cell imaging is advantageous for research were you may be worried about artifacts of fixation or when you want to measure a phenomenon over time. Live cell imaging is more difficult to achieve than fixed samples because we need to keep the cells live AND happy along with obtaining the images we need. We can reduce artifacts by keeping the cells in a favorable environment and minimizing external stressors. Here are 5 points to keep in mind when setting up your live cell imaging experiment.

1. Environmental controls.

A specific and controlled environment needs to be created for successful live cell imaging. Specifically, with mammalian cells, we need a specific temperature, CO2 concentration, and humidity. The temperature should be 37 degrees Celsius, CO2 should be 5%, and there needs to be enough humidity so that we don’t have evaporation. We are essentially trying to recreate the environment of the incubator for the cell, while we are imaging.

Unfavorable conditions can cause artifacts, or cell death, defeating the purpose of live cell imaging.

There are some tricks that we can use to maintain a favorable environment. Buffers, such as HEPES, can help buffer against CO2 and acidification of the media. Addition of humidity can help minimize evaporation. Evaporation can change the concentration of nutrients or treatments within the media causing unintended changes.

2. Short exposure or low laser, is possible to prevent phototoxicity.

Light causes phototoxicity by interacting with molecular oxygen and creating free radicals. Free radicals, or reactive oxygen species, cause damage to DNA and proteins if high levels are maintained. One way to avoid this is to use longer wavelengths. Longer wavelengths inherently have less energy, so they are not nearly as damaging to a cell. Just like your skin, it’s better to have long wavelengths interacting with your skin than the UV rays.

Sometimes you need to compromise with subpar image quality in order to not bleach or cause cell death, due to phototoxicity. You have sufficient signal for analysis if it at least three times the signal to the background of your image. It may not be pretty, but it is more important that your cells are happy. If you need an ideal image, I generally suggest taking it at a different time than your time course. This way the phototoxicity won’t affect the data you are quantifying.

As a control for phototoxicity, I suggest imaging your probe or unstained cell with the exposure you plan to use and see if any changes occur without the addition of your treatment. This will ensure that the changes that you see with treatment are not due to just the way the cells are being imaged.

3. You can’t use antibodies for labeling.

Antibodies are great because they can be very specific, but they are generally not compatible with live cell imaging. You must use fluorescent proteins and dyes because antibodies can’t penetrate into the cell without permeabilization. Permeabilization would kill the cell you are trying to study because it can no longer maintain homeostasis

Another problem with using antibodies, is that they can activate or block signaling pathways by binding receptors on the membrane.

All dyes may not be suitable for live cell imaging, though. If a dye has not been published for live cell imaging, several tests may be of use. First, combine the dye with a well-known dye and measure co-localization. If that is successful, then dyes need to be examined for phototoxicity. A dye that induces rounding up, or blebbing, is not ideal for live cell imaging. This can easily be observed with DIC or phase contrast imaging.

Fluorescent proteins tags are often a good choice for live cell imaging but can come with their own set of problems. First is the ability to dimerize or oligomerize with other tags. If your protein is supposed to be a monomer, then make sure that you pick a fluorescent protein that is a monomer. DsRed, a common red fluorescent protein, has a tendency to form tetramers in cells. This may affect the location of your protein as well as interfere with the function of your protein due to the large size of the tag. The best practice is to try several fluorescent proteins and try both terminal ends of your protein of interest. Then try the different constructs and see which one works best for your scientific question.

If you want pre-screened fluorescent protein constructs, I would suggest checking if Addgene has it. This is useful because there is already published data on it, so you will know it works.

4. Focus drift due to temperature changes.

According to Boyle’s Law, where PV equals NRT, if the temperature changes and the pressure remains the same then there will be the expansion of volume. This creates small changes in the location of a sample. Even though these changes are small, in the microscopic world it is enough to cause a problem. When the focus is measured in micrometers, these changes can cause the sample to be out of focus.

The best way to prevent this is to allow your microscope enough time to equilibrate to the higher temperature. If possible, allow your imaging system to warm for 30 minutes to an hour. Then move your sample from the incubator to your imaging chamber and let rest for a further 10 minutes. This is generally sufficient to minimize changes due to temperature changes.

Several commercial companies now have an autofocus function to aid with changes during live cell imaging. They work by bouncing far-red light off the interface of the coverslip and the liquid. The machine then makes adjustments for any changes in the coverslip. This keeps the coverslip in focus, but if your sample moves (e.g. rounding up for mitosis) there is nothing the system can do to correct for that.

5. Speed.

This is also known as temporal resolution, or how often you need to image to be able to see the event. Some events are very rapid such as calcium bursts. Some are much slower.

For very rapid imaging, phototoxicity is a big concern. If you’re imaging the same spot over and over, the live cell imaging can’t be a long time course because there isn’t a chance for the cell to recover from the photodamage. Rapid imaging can cause photobleaching as well. This needs to be measured in a separate experiment so you can compensate for it during intensity analysis.

Long time courses require cells to rest and recover homeostasis between imaging sessions. So, if you’re doing a 24-hour time course, often you can only image every 10 or 15 minutes.

When planning out the timing of your imaging you need to take into account exposure/scan speed, the number of channels, time for physical movement of any components and if you are taking a z-stack. The time one full set of images can add up quickly if you are doing multiple channels and focal planes.

Performing experiments with just your cells and your probe before you begin can save you a lot of time in the long run and hopefully a few headaches.

To learn more about the 5 Special Considerations for Live Cell Imaging, and to get access to all of our advanced microscopy materials including training videos, presentations, workbooks, and private group membership, get on the Expert Microscopy wait list.

Join Expert Cytometry's Mastery Class

ABOUT HEATHER BROWN-HARDING

Heather Brown-Harding, PhD, is currently the assistant director of Wake Forest Microscopy and graduate teaching faculty.She also maintains a small research group that works on imaging of host-pathogen interactions. Heather is passionate about making science accessible to everyone.High-quality research shouldn’t be exclusive to elite institutions or made incomprehensible by unnecessary jargon. She created the modules for Excite Microscopy with this mission.

In her free time, she enjoys playing with her cat & dog, trying out new craft ciders and painting.You can find her on twitter (@microscopyEd) a few times of day discussing new imaging techniques with peers.

Heather Brown-Harding

Similar Articles

Which Fluorophores To Use For Your Microscopy Experiment

Which Fluorophores To Use For Your Microscopy Experiment

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Fluorophore selection is important. I have often been asked by my facility users which fluorophore is best suited for their experiments. The answer to this is mostly dependent on whether they are using a widefield microscope with set excitation/emission cubes or a laser based system that lets you select the laser and the emission window. Once you have narrowed down which fluorophores you can excite and collect the correct emission, you can further refine the specific fluorophore that is best for your experiment.  In this blog  we will discuss how to determine what can work with your microscope, and how…

4 No Cost Ways To Improve Your Microscopy Image Quality

4 No Cost Ways To Improve Your Microscopy Image Quality

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Image quality is critical for accurate and reproducible data. Many people get stuck on the magnification of the objective or on using a confocal instead of a widefield microscope. There are several other factors that affect the image quality such as the numerical aperture of the objective, the signal-to-noise ratio of the system, or the brightness of the sample.  Numerical aperture is the ability of an objective to collect light from a sample, but it contributes to two key formulas that will affect your image quality. The first is the theoretical resolution of the objective. It is expressed with the…

What Is Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy & Is It Right For You?

What Is Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy & Is It Right For You?

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

TIRF is not as common as other microscopy based techniques due to certain restrictions. We will discuss these restrictions, then analyze why it might be perfect for your experiment.  TIRF relies on an evanescent wave, created through a critical angle of coherent light (i.e. laser) that reaches a refractive index mismatch.  What does it mean in practice?  A high angle laser reflects off the interface of the coverslip and the sample. Although the depth that this wave penetrates is dependent on the wavelength of the light, in practice it is approximately 50-300nm from the coverslip. Therefore, the cell membrane is…

5 Drool Worthy Imaging Advances Of 2020

5 Drool Worthy Imaging Advances Of 2020

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

2020 was a difficult year for many, with their own research being interrupted- either by lab shutdowns or recruitment into the race against COVID-19. Despite the challenges, scientists have continued to be creative and have pushed the boundaries of what is possible. These are the techniques and technologies that every microscopist was envious of in 2020. Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Nature Methods declared that spatially resolved transcriptomics was the 2020 method of the year. These are a  group of methods that combine gene expression with their physical location. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) was originally developed for cells that had been dissociated…

Picking The Right Functional Imaging Probe

Picking The Right Functional Imaging Probe

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

As biologists, we study the process of life, however, it’s intricacies cannot be captured by a snapshot in time. Generally, the easiest imaging experiments are those where the samples are stained, fixed, and imaged within a few days of procurement, but that too doesn’t capture the dynamic processes common in cells and organisms. Live cell imaging when combined with reporters serves as a powerful tool to provide solid imaging data. Cameleon —one of the first reporters— was developed in 1997 in Roger Tsien’s lab.  Cameleon is a green fluorescent protein (GFP) that undergoes a conformational change in the presence of…

7 Key Image Analysis Terms For New Microscopist

7 Key Image Analysis Terms For New Microscopist

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

As scientists, we need to perform image analysis after we’ve acquired images in the microscope, otherwise, we have just a pretty picture and not data. The vocabulary for image processing and analysis can be a little intimidating to those new to the field. Therefore, in this blog, I’m going to break down 7 terms that are key when post-processing of images. 1. RGB Image Images acquired during microscopy can be grouped into two main categories. Either monochrome (that can be multichannel) or “RGB.” RGB stands for red, green, blue – the primary colors of light. The cameras in our phones…

The 5 Essentials To Successful Spectral Unmixing

The 5 Essentials To Successful Spectral Unmixing

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

In an ideal world, we would be able to use fluorophores that don’t have any overlap in emission spectra and autofluorescence wouldn’t obscure your signal. Unfortunately, we don’t live in such a world and often have to use two closely related dyes – or contend with fluorescent molecules that are innately part of our sample. Fluorescent molecules include chlorophyll, collagen, NADPH, and vitamin A.  One example that I recently encountered was developing a new probe for lipids. The reviewers requested a direct comparison of the new dye to Nile Red in the same sample. Both dyes would localize to the…

The 5 Fundamental Methods For Imaging Nucleic Acids

The 5 Fundamental Methods For Imaging Nucleic Acids

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

A lot of microscopy assays are focused on labeling and imaging proteins. We often use antibodies against specific protein antigens or fuse a fluorescent protein to a protein of interest.  These methods cover many applications, but maybe you are interested in viral RNA, gene duplication, or need a counterstain to label the nucleus. You can’t fuse a protein to nucleic acids, so where should you start? Try these 5 assays to image nucleic acids: Nucleic Acid Dyes  Nucleic acid dyes are small molecules that increase fluorescence when bound to nucleic acids.  They can bind DNA, RNA, or both, but do…

Designing Microscopy Experiments Related To Infectious Diseases And Antivirals

Designing Microscopy Experiments Related To Infectious Diseases And Antivirals

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Designing microscopy experiments related to infectious diseases and antivirals can be challenging, but there's never been a more vital time than right now to design adequate microscopy experiments. The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and spread across the globe becoming the pandemic that the world is reeling with today. Currently, COVID-19  has no targeted therapies approved by the FDA, so the best coronavirus prevention happens through social distancing and good hygiene practices. However, companies are rapidly testing candidate molecules and vaccines as fast as they can. Initial tests suggest there may be some drugs that…

Top Industry Career eBooks

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Learn the best practices and advanced techniques across the diverse fields of microscopy, including instrumentation, experimental setup, image analysis, figure preparation, and more.

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Learn the best practices of flow cytometry experimentation, data analysis, figure preparation, antibody panel design, instrumentation and more.

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Advanced 4-10 Color Compensation, Learn strategies for designing advanced antibody compensation panels and how to use your compensation matrix to analyze your experimental data.