How To Detect Microvesicles, Microparticles, And Ectosomes By Flow Cytometry

There seems to be a big fuss about small flow these days.

What is small flow?

Microvescles, microparticles, ectosomes—the terminology is all over the place but one thing is certain…

There is a need for flow cytometric analysis of extracellular vesicles.

To avoid ambiguity in this post, the population of extracellular vesicles discussed here shall be called microvesicles.

These small, membrane bound fractions of cells released during activation and apoptosis are in the 0.1 to 1 micron diameter size range (or there about depending on which article you read).

Released in vast quantities and carrying a variety of traits from the originating cell these microvesicles are known to be involved in a wide range of processed from stem cell renewal and tumor metastases through to coagulation and inflammation, just to name a few!

They key is that microvesicles have a huge potential to be important biomarkers in early disease detection and/or treatment progression.

What’s Down There? Debris Or Microvesicles?

Microvesicles have been known about for a long time, being dismissed by the regular flow cytometrist as debris or platelet dust and quickly gated out of any subsequent analysis.

microvesicle experiment by flow cytometry | Expert Cytometry | microparticle analysis

There is increasing interest in seeing what is down there. As in, what is down in the lower left-hand corner of the above figure.

Is it debris? Is it platelet dust? Is it a population of microvesicles?

Or is it all three?

The above figure is a representation of what we are missing when we ignore events in that range.

It’s important to note that the sample on the right in the above figure was further processed before re-analysis in the microvesicle range.

4 Microvesicle Flow Cytometry Mistakes To Avoid

Microvesicles originate from cells and have the same analysis requirements as cells.

For these and other reasons, flow cytometry is a popular choice for microvesicle analysis. However, there are pitfalls with small particle flow cytometry that have led to many conflicting publications.

The only way to avoid these mistakes is to first identify them and then take measures to prevent them.

The following are 4 common mistakes researchers make when preparing microvesicle flow cytometry experiments, as well as how to prevent these mistakes…

1. Not accounting for flow cytometry protocol discrepancies.

Before getting started with your microvesicle experiment, you must take into account pre-analytical variations. When the particles are this small, even the slightest protocol variations can affect your experiment.

Centrifugation speed and duration, collection technique, storage, staining protocols (in particular antibody panels and titration levels) are just a few of the things you should consider.

Minor differences in these protocol steps can lead to huge discrepancies in downstream analysis.

2. Using beads to define microvesicle size ranges.

When setting up for the analysis of microvesicles, many people choose flow cytometry beads to define a size range.

The problem here is, in terms of standards, the different refractive index between beads and microvesicles becomes troublesome.

For example, a polystyrene bead may have a refractive index of about 1.59 whereas while the refractive index of many microvesilces are around 1.39 (for reference, water is 1.33).

Beads scatter a lot more light compared to microvesicles of the same diameter, reportedly up to 100 times!

Here’s the lesson—just because you can see a 0.2 micron diameter bead by flow does not mean you can see a 0.2 micron diameter microvesicle by flow.

3. Failing to acknowledge the possibility of unseen information.

Microvesicles are between 0.1 – 1 micron diameters in size. Though most fall in the smaller end of that range.

Commercial cytometers can struggle to detect light from a 0.2 micron diameter bead. As discussed in point #2 above, beads scatter a LOT more light than microvesicles.

With this in mind you have to ask yourself, how many microvesicles can I actually see by flow cytometry?

According to many flow cytometrists—not a lot.

When analyzing microvesicles by conventional flow cytometry, it’s worth considering the massive amount of information that goes unseen.

Don’t assume you’re seeing all the microvesicles in your experiment. Instead, constantly ask yourself, “What am I NOT seeing?”

As techniques improve, you’ll be able to see more and more information and continue to get a clearer picture of what’s really going on in your microvesicle flow cytometry experiments.

4. Failing to account for coincident events.

Accounting for coincidence events is important to every flow cytometry experiment, including experiments measuring and reporting microvesicles.

This is especially true if you’re hoping to publish the flow cytometry data you obtain.

The problem here is that conventional doublet discrimination in this microvesicle size ranges is exceedingly difficult.

A single event, or dot, on a flow cytometry plot may actually be many, many microvesicles passing through the laser beam at the same time. The only way to know for sure is to check.

One way to check your microvesicle analysis is with serial dilutions.

If you’re able to see a stable fluorescent signal with dilutions resulting in a lower event count, you can gain more certainty over the assumption that you’re analyzing (mostly) single events.

The analysis of microvesicles by flow cytometry is not easy. However, until better instrumentation is developed, in wide use, and shown to be more accurate, using conventional flow cytometry to detect and measure microvesicles is of great value. While a multi-platform strategy continues to be the wisest approach, much information on microvesicles can be gained by conventional flow cytometry.

To learn more about detecting microvesicles by flow cytometry and to get access to all of our advanced materials including 20 training videos, presentations, workbooks, and private group membership, get on the Flow Cytometry Mastery Class wait list.

Join Expert Cytometry's Mastery Class
Tim Bushnell, PhD
Tim Bushnell, PhD

Tim Bushnell holds a PhD in Biology from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is a co-founder of—and didactic mind behind—ExCyte, the world’s leading flow cytometry training company, which organization boasts a veritable library of in-the-lab resources on sequencing, microscopy, and related topics in the life sciences.

Similar Articles

Getting A New Flow Cytometer? Try Before You Buy (And 2 Other Tips)

Getting A New Flow Cytometer? Try Before You Buy (And 2 Other Tips)

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

There are 4 major ways to sort cells. The first way can use magnetic beads coupled to antibodies and pass the cells through a magnetic field. The labeled cells will stick, and the unlabeled cells will remain in the supernatant. The second way is to use some sort of mechanical force like a flapper or air stream that separates the target cells from the bulk population. The third way is the recently introduced microfluidics sorter, which uses microfluidics channels to isolate the target cells. The last method, which is the most common––based on Fuwyler’s work––is the electrostatic cell sorter. This…

5-Point Guide To Buying A New Microscope For Your Lab

5-Point Guide To Buying A New Microscope For Your Lab

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Have you ever noticed how painful it can be to purchase a new microscope? It would be hard to miss – this can be a frustrating process. A lot of scientists and students consider the new microscope hunt quite scary for a variety of reasons. It might be that you’re worried you won’t get the right microscope and that you’ll regret it, or you may find that dealing with salespeople, in general, makes you kind of uncomfortable. But remember, salespeople are just human beings like you and me, and if we can treat them as such, the whole process of…

We Tested 5 Major Flow Cytometry SPADE Programs for Speed - Here Are The Results

We Tested 5 Major Flow Cytometry SPADE Programs for Speed - Here Are The Results

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

In the flow cytometry community, SPADE (Spanning-tree Progression Analysis of Density-normalized Events) is a favored algorithm for dealing with highly multidimensional or otherwise complex datasets. Like tSNE, SPADE extracts information across events in your data unsupervised and presents the result in a unique visual format. Given the growing popularity of this kind of algorithm for dealing with complex datasets, we decided to test the SPADE algorithm in 5 software packages, including Cytobank, FCS Express, FlowJo, R, and the original, free software made available by the author of SPADE. Which was the fastest?

Ask These 7 Questions Before Purchasing A Flow Cytometer

Ask These 7 Questions Before Purchasing A Flow Cytometer

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

I am still convinced that my first cell sorter was possessed. The number of issues that I had with the system remains hard for me to believe, even after all these years. It had been purchased, in part, from one vendor because the sales rep for a competitor was nowhere to be found. At that time, I admit I wasn’t overly diligent in my research process. Since then, I’ve pinpointed some critical questions that need to be answered before purchasing a new instrument. At the end of the process, a shiny new instrument will arrive at your facility. Make sure…

5 FlowJo Hacks To Boost The Quality Of Your Flow Cytometry Analysis

5 FlowJo Hacks To Boost The Quality Of Your Flow Cytometry Analysis

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

FlowJo is a powerful tool for performing and analyzing flow cytometry experiments, if you know how to use it to the fullest. This includes understanding embedding and using keywords, the FlowJo compensation wizard, spillover spreading matrix, FlowJo and R, and creating tables in FlowJo. Extending your use of FJ using these hacks will help organize your data, improve analysis and make your exported data easier to understand and explain to others. Take a few moments and explore all you can do with FJ beyond just gating populations.

Instrument Quality Control For Reproducible Flow Cytometry Experiments

Instrument Quality Control For Reproducible Flow Cytometry Experiments

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

The flow cytometer is an integral component of any flow cytometry experiment, and special attention should be paid to ensuring that it is working correctly and consistently. As an end-user, the researcher should be able to sit down at a machine and know that it is performing the same way today as it was yesterday and last week. Equally important is that if any changes in instrument performance have occured, the end-user knows how they have been addressed and corrected, rather than letting them fester and potentially affect the results. Quality control measurements can include a variety of targets, such…

Statistical Challenges Of Rare Event Measurements In Flow Cytometry

Statistical Challenges Of Rare Event Measurements In Flow Cytometry

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

It is necessary to sort through hundreds of thousands or millions of cells to find the few events of interest. With such low event numbers, we move away from the comfortable domain of the Gaussian distribution and move into the realm of Poisson statistics. There are 3 points to consider to build confidence in the data that the events being counted are truly events of interest and not random events that just happen to fall into the gates of interest.

How to Optimize Flow Cytometry Hardware For Rare Event Analysis

How to Optimize Flow Cytometry Hardware For Rare Event Analysis

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Preparing for rare event analysis requires an understanding of the power and limitation of the instrument to be used. From how fast to run the fluidics, to how the signal is processed to the number of gates that can be used in the sorting experiment, each factor impacts the outcome of the experiment.

How To Choose The Correct Antibody For Accurate Flow Cytometry Results

How To Choose The Correct Antibody For Accurate Flow Cytometry Results

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

With the added emphasis on reproducibility, it is critical to look at every step where experiments can be improved. No single step makes an experiment more reproducible, rather it is a process, making changes at each stage that leads to reproducibility. Antibodies comprise a critical component that needs to be reviewed. As Bradbury et al. in a commentary in Nature pointed out, the global spending on antibodies is about $1.6 billion a year, and it is estimated about half of that money is spent on “bad” antibodies. This does not include the additional costs of wasted time and effort by…

Top Technical Training eBooks

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Learn the best practices and advanced techniques across the diverse fields of microscopy, including instrumentation, experimental setup, image analysis, figure preparation, and more.

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Learn the best practices of flow cytometry experimentation, data analysis, figure preparation, antibody panel design, instrumentation and more.

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Advanced 4-10 Color Compensation, Learn strategies for designing advanced antibody compensation panels and how to use your compensation matrix to analyze your experimental data.