3 Guidelines For Setting Compensation Controls In Flow Cytometry Experiments

Fluorescence compensation is not possible without proper controls, so it is critical to spend the time and effort to generate high-quality controls in the preparation of an experiment.

First, recall that compensation is a consequence of spectral overlap, which occurs because the fluorescence emission spectra of essentially all fluorophores are wider in wavelength range than the optical filters that we use to measure those fluorophores.

Because of this, fluorophore emission will often overlap with more than one filterset on the cytometer, leading to the detection of the signal from one fluorophore by multiple detectors (i.e. spillover). The more colors measured within a single experiment, the more crowded the spectrum becomes and the more severe this kind of crosstalk is.

Compensation is a mathematical process that deals with this problem by removing a percentage of the total signal from each detector.

This percentage corresponds to the amount of signal spillover signal that is contributed to this detector by all the other fluorophores being used in the experiment. The compensation calculation relies on the fundamental concept that the amount of spillover of a fluorophore (e.g. fluorophore A) into a detector (e.g. fluorophore B) is defined by the ratio of A’s signal in B’s detector to A’s signal in its own detector.

This relationship between two detectors, the spillover coefficient, defines the spillover regardless of the amount of dye, so it can be used correctly for the spectral overlap in a typical experimental setting in which amounts of dye can vary widely between and within samples.

Given all of these points, the most important aspect of setting up a relevant, proper, and functional compensation matrix is to ensure that the spillover coefficient is accurate, is wholly reliant on good controls.

What Is A High Quality Compensation Control?

What does it mean for a compensation control to be “proper” or “good”?

The Daily Dongle, contains a much-cited and useful post, Three Rules For Compensation Controls and answers this question with three guidelines:

  • Each compensation control must be as bright as, or brighter, than the experimental stain.
  • Autofluorescence should be the same for the positive and negative populations used for the compensation calculation in each channel.
  • The fluorophore used must be the exact fluorophore (i.e. same molecular structure) that is used in the experimental sample.

Let’s look at each of these in detail.

Keep in mind that properly compensating a channel requires both a fluorescent, or stained population (for every fluorescent channel), and a nonfluorescent, or very dim, population.

These populations can either be present:

  • in a single tube (e.g. a lysed whole blood stained with a marker which will be present on only a portion of the total number of cells)
  • or, in separate tubes.

In the latter case, the controls would consist of (1) a single universal negative tube, used to designate the negative population in all channels and (2) a tube containing stained cells or beads for each channel.

Note that the single-stained controls may or may not contain negative cells. Regardless, when using a universal negative, the operator instructs the cytometry software to utilize the nonfluorescent population in the universal negative control and to ignore any nonfluorescent cells or beads in the single-stain controls.

3 Keys To Creating High Quality Compensation Controls

Dimly fluorescent populations tend to spread out (have higher coefficients of variation) when measured with flow cytometry

1. Account for brightness.

You may be wondering whether the compensation matrix may be irrelevant and inaccurate if compensation controls signal intensities are not exactly matched to the experiment’s samples.

The answer is a firm no: they don’t need to be matched. This is the beauty of compensation…

The spillover coefficient defines a ratio of interaction between two channels that is independent of the amount of fluorophore.

Another way of thinking about the spillover coefficient is that it defines the slope of a line that can be drawn between the nonfluorescent and fluorescent populations, connecting their medians, in an uncompensated plot of data from a single-color control.

The slope, or angle, of this line defines the amount of compensation required to correct the spillover between the two channels on the plots (see Figure 1 below).

Cytometer compensation required to correct spillover

The accuracy of the slope of the line described above is only as robust as the quality of the compensation controls used to generate it.

This accuracy can be compromised when the signal in the experimental sample is brighter than the signal from the compensation control for a given channel.

By nature, dimly fluorescent populations tend to spread out (have higher coefficients of variation). This is because fewer photons are measured from a dimly fluorescent population than they are from a brightly fluorescent population.

When a population is spread out in this way, there is uncertainty in the determination of the median, which will introduce uncertainty into the determination of the spillover coefficient (see Figure 2 below).

Spillover coefficient in cytometer

2. Account for autofluorescence.

Autofluorescence is an inevitable component of the total fluorescent signal in any channel.

This contribution has no effect on compensation as long as its extent is identical between the fluorescent and nonfluorescent populations used to calculate compensation.

However, the story is quite different if the autofluorescence intensity is unequal between these fluorescent and nonfluorescent populations (see Figure 3 below).

Autofluorescence intensity is unequal between fluorescent and nonfluorescent populations in a flow cytometry experiment

If the autofluorescence intensity of the bright and negative populations in a compensation control is augmented identically, both populations will shift on the scale of the channel to be compensated.

Nevertheless, the slope of the line that can be drawn between their medians is unaffected; therefore, the spillover coefficient and the compensation matrix will also be unaffected.

However, a change in the slope of this line will occur if the autofluorescence of only one of the populations is modulated, and this will impact the compensation matrix.

The bottom line here is to make sure that whichever cells or particles being used for a negative control or population have the same autofluorescence intensity in every channel as the cells or particles being used for the stained controls.

One common instance where this can be problematic is when generating a control for CD14 staining. CD14 is expressed on monocytes, which can be significantly more autofluorescent than other blood cells.

Therefore, if cells are used for compensation controls (e.g. lysed whole blood), then the autofluorescence intensity of the CD14-positive population will be more intense than the CD14- negative population.

This is a good situation for antibody capture beads, which are manufactured to have very consistent autofluorescence levels among particle types.

3. Match your fluorophores.

Finally, be sure that the fluorophore used to generate a compensation control is exactly the same fluorophore that is used in the experimental sample.

For example, avoid using an Alexa FluorⓇ 488-conjugated antibody to compensate for GFP. Even though similar, Alexa FluorⓇ 488 and GFP are different fluorophores and contain different emission spectra, so a compensation control prepared using Alexa 488 will generate a different compensation matrix than one prepared using GFP. Figure 4 below illustrates this difference in emission spectra between Alexa FluorⓇ 488 and GFP (spectra were generated using the BioLegendⓇ Fluorescence Spectra Analyzer)

Figure 4 illustrates the difference in emission spectra between Alexa FluorⓇ 488 and GFP (spectra were generated using the BioLegendⓇ Fluorescence Spectra Analyzer)

This extends further to tandem dyes like PE-Cy5, APC-Cy7, and the Brilliant Violet™ dyes, some of which can be tandem dyes.

Due to differences in conjugation efficiency between the donor and acceptor dyes, different lots of a particular tandem may differ in emission spectra and intensity, so make sure that compensation controls are generated using the same antibody conjugate that is used in the experimental sample. This is another situation in which antibody capture beads can be extremely useful.

Fluorescence compensation is not possible without proper controls, so it is critical to spend the time and effort to generate high-quality controls in the preparation of an experiment.

For a compensation control to be considered “good” or “proper”, each compensation control must be as bright as or brighter than the experimental stain, autofluorescence should be the same for the positive and negative populations used for the compensation calculation in each channel, and the fluorophore used must be the exact fluorophore (i.e. same molecular structure) that is used in the experimental sample.

To learn more about 3 guidelines for setting compensation controls in flow cytometry experiments, and to get access to all of our advanced materials including 20 training videos, presentations, workbooks, and private group membership, get on the Flow Cytometry Mastery Class wait list.

Join Expert Cytometry's Mastery Class
Tim Bushnell, PhD
Tim Bushnell, PhD

Tim Bushnell holds a PhD in Biology from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is a co-founder of—and didactic mind behind—ExCyte, the world’s leading flow cytometry training company, which organization boasts a veritable library of in-the-lab resources on sequencing, microscopy, and related topics in the life sciences.

Similar Articles

How To Profile DNA And RNA Expression Using Next Generation Sequencing

How To Profile DNA And RNA Expression Using Next Generation Sequencing

By: Deepak Kumar, PhD

Why is Next Generation Sequencing so powerful to explore and answer both clinical and research questions. With the ability to sequence whole genomes, identifying novel changes between individuals, to exploring what RNA sequences are being expressed, or to examine DNA modifications and protein-DNA interactions occurring that can help researchers better understand the complex regulation of transcription. This, in turn, allows them to characterize changes during different disease states, which can suggest a way to treat said disease.  Over the next two blogs, I will highlight these different methods along with illustrating how these can help clinical diagnostics as well as…

Optimizing Flow Cytometry Experiments - Part 2         How To Block Samples (Sample Blocking)

Optimizing Flow Cytometry Experiments - Part 2 How To Block Samples (Sample Blocking)

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

In my previous blog on  experimental optimization, we discussed the idea of identifying the best antibody concentration for staining the cells. We did this through a process called titration, which  focuses on finding the best signal-to-noise ratio at the lowest antibody concentration. In this blog we will deal with sample blocking As a reminder, there are two other major binding concerns with antibodies. The first is the specific binding of the Fc fragment of the antibody to the Fc Receptor expressed on some cells. This protein is critical for the process of destroying microbes or other cells that have been…

What Is Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) And How Is It Used In Drug Development

What Is Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) And How Is It Used In Drug Development

By: Deepak Kumar, PhD

NGS methodologies have been used to produce high-throughput sequence data. These data with appropriate computational analyses facilitate variant identification and prove to be extremely valuable in pharmaceutical industries and clinical practice for developing drug molecules inhibiting disease progression. Thus, by providing a comprehensive profile of an individual’s variome — particularly that of clinical relevance consisting of pathogenic variants — NGS helps in determining new disease genes. The information thus obtained on genetic variations and the target disease genes can be used by the Pharma companies to develop drugs impeding these variants and their disease-causing effect. However simple this may allude…

How To Determine The Optimal Antibody Concentration For Your Flow Cytometry Experiment (Part 1 of 6)

How To Determine The Optimal Antibody Concentration For Your Flow Cytometry Experiment (Part 1 of 6)

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Over the next series of blog posts, we will explore the different aspects of optimizing a polychromatic flow cytometry panel. These steps range from figuring out the best voltage to use, which controls are critical for data interpretation, what quality control tools can be integrated into the assay; how to block cells, and more. This blog will focus on determining the optimal antibody concentration.  As a reminder about the antibody structure, a schematic of an antibody is shown below.  Figure 1: Schematic of an antibody. Figure from Wikipedia. The antibody is composed of two heavy chains and two light chains that…

Brightness Is In The Eye Of The Detector - What To Consider When Designing Your Panel

Brightness Is In The Eye Of The Detector - What To Consider When Designing Your Panel

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

The heart and soul of the flow cytometry experiment is the ‘panel.’ The unique combinations of antibodies, antigens, fluorochromes, and other reagents are central to identifying the cells of interest and extracting the data necessary to answer the question at hand. Designing the right panel for flow cytometry is essential for detecting different modalities. The more parameters that can be interrogated will yield more information about the target cells. Current instruments can measure as many as 40 different parameters simultaneously. This is exciting, as it allows for more complex questions to be studied. Panel design is also valuable for precious samples,…

7 Key Image Analysis Terms For New Microscopist

7 Key Image Analysis Terms For New Microscopist

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

As scientists, we need to perform image analysis after we’ve acquired images in the microscope, otherwise, we have just a pretty picture and not data. The vocabulary for image processing and analysis can be a little intimidating to those new to the field. Therefore, in this blog, I’m going to break down 7 terms that are key when post-processing of images. 1. RGB Image Images acquired during microscopy can be grouped into two main categories. Either monochrome (that can be multichannel) or “RGB.” RGB stands for red, green, blue – the primary colors of light. The cameras in our phones…

The 5 Fundamental Methods For Imaging Nucleic Acids

The 5 Fundamental Methods For Imaging Nucleic Acids

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

There are 4 major ways to sort cells. The first way can use magnetic beads coupled to antibodies and pass the cells through a magnetic field. The labeled cells will stick, and the unlabeled cells will remain in the supernatant. The second way is to use some sort of mechanical force like a flapper or air stream that separates the target cells from the bulk population. The third way is the recently introduced microfluidics sorter, which uses microfluidics channels to isolate the target cells. The last method, which is the most common––based on Fuwyler’s work––is the electrostatic cell sorter. This…

Avoid Flow Cytometry Faux Pas: How To Set Voltage The Right Way

Avoid Flow Cytometry Faux Pas: How To Set Voltage The Right Way

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

There are 4 major ways to sort cells. The first way can use magnetic beads coupled to antibodies and pass the cells through a magnetic field. The labeled cells will stick, and the unlabeled cells will remain in the supernatant. The second way is to use some sort of mechanical force like a flapper or air stream that separates the target cells from the bulk population. The third way is the recently introduced microfluidics sorter, which uses microfluidics channels to isolate the target cells. The last method, which is the most common––based on Fuwyler’s work––is the electrostatic cell sorter. This…

Designing Microscopy Experiments Related To Infectious Diseases And Antivirals

Designing Microscopy Experiments Related To Infectious Diseases And Antivirals

By: Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

There are 4 major ways to sort cells. The first way can use magnetic beads coupled to antibodies and pass the cells through a magnetic field. The labeled cells will stick, and the unlabeled cells will remain in the supernatant. The second way is to use some sort of mechanical force like a flapper or air stream that separates the target cells from the bulk population. The third way is the recently introduced microfluidics sorter, which uses microfluidics channels to isolate the target cells. The last method, which is the most common––based on Fuwyler’s work––is the electrostatic cell sorter. This…

Top Technical Training eBooks

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Learn the best practices and advanced techniques across the diverse fields of microscopy, including instrumentation, experimental setup, image analysis, figure preparation, and more.

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Learn the best practices of flow cytometry experimentation, data analysis, figure preparation, antibody panel design, instrumentation and more.

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Advanced 4-10 Color Compensation, Learn strategies for designing advanced antibody compensation panels and how to use your compensation matrix to analyze your experimental data.