The Most Common Mistake Researchers Make When Designing Flow Cytometry Antibody Panels

Pairing highly expressed antigens (like CD3) with dimmer fluorochromes, and the antigens of interest with the brightest fluorochromes, is a key part of panel design with few tools to help.

With early generation instruments, this was relatively easy to determine, since fluorochrome choice was limited. With the advent of instruments capable of measuring more than 4 fluorochromes, there is a need to characterize the relative brightness of different fluorochromes under actual experimental conditions, rather than as free fluors.

Bigos et al (2004) first reported this in an abstract and it was later simplified in Maecker et al (2004). This equation (Figure 1)compares the  differences between the means of the positive and negative and corrects this value by dividing by two times the spread (as measured by the standard deviation) of the negative population.

This measure — the Staining Index (or SI) allows for the comparison of the relative brightness of fluorochromes.  As shown in Figure 2 below, if the different fluorochromes are attached to the same antigen, cells can be stained and the SI compared. Researchers who fail to consider SI values are making a significant mistake that can negatively impact their flow cytometry experiments. 

The above calculations reveals that PE > APC > FITC > PerCP   Thus, providing the researcher with critical information necessary to design the polychromatic panel.

There were some limitations to this Staining Index. Most notably was the fact that the data was corrected by the standard deviation of the noise. With many fluorochromes on digital instruments, at least part of the negative signal is background noise the can be attributed in part to the electronic noise in the flow cytometer. A modification of the SI was pulsed by Telford et al. (2009).  The equation for this correction is shown in Figure 3.

In this equation the difference between the medians of the positive and negative populations and divides that by the right hand of the negative distribution, as reflected by the 84% of the negative minus the median of the negative. This Separation Index (or SI) provides a similar metric to the Bigos/Maecker Staining Index as shown in Figure 4.

Be it Staining or Separation, the SI is a critical parameter and the experiment is straightforward, and can be performed using any highly-expressed antigen that is available in many fluorochromes.

Join Expert Cytometry's Mastery Class
Tim Bushnell, PhD
Tim Bushnell, PhD

Tim Bushnell holds a PhD in Biology from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is a co-founder of—and didactic mind behind—ExCyte, the world’s leading flow cytometry training company, which organization boasts a veritable library of in-the-lab resources on sequencing, microscopy, and related topics in the life sciences.

Similar Articles

6 Areas Of Consideration For Flow Cytometry Cell Cycle Analysis

6 Areas Of Consideration For Flow Cytometry Cell Cycle Analysis

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Cell cycle seems like such a straightforward assay. At its heart, it is a one-color assay and should be a simple protocol to follow. However, as discussed before, fixation and dye concentrations are critical. Once those are optimized, it becomes important to run the cells low and slow in order to get the best quality histograms for analysis — the topic of another blog. Adding the critical CEN and TEN controls will help standardize the assay, and ensure consistency and reproducibility between runs while helping identify non-standard (aneuploid, polyploid) populations from normal ploidy. Trying to isolate and focus on specific…

Why Cell Cycle Analysis Details Are Critical In Flow Cytometry

Why Cell Cycle Analysis Details Are Critical In Flow Cytometry

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Cell cycle analysis appears to be deceptively easy in concept, but details are absolutely critical. It is not possible to hide the data if there is poor sample preparation, incorrect dye ratios, too much (or too little) staining time, etc. Forgetting RNAse when using PI will doom your data to failure. Take these basics into account as you move into performing this simple, yet amazingly informative assay.

How To Choose The Correct Antibody For Accurate Flow Cytometry Results

How To Choose The Correct Antibody For Accurate Flow Cytometry Results

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

With the added emphasis on reproducibility, it is critical to look at every step where experiments can be improved. No single step makes an experiment more reproducible, rather it is a process, making changes at each stage that leads to reproducibility. Antibodies comprise a critical component that needs to be reviewed. As Bradbury et al. in a commentary in Nature pointed out, the global spending on antibodies is about $1.6 billion a year, and it is estimated about half of that money is spent on “bad” antibodies. This does not include the additional costs of wasted time and effort by…

5 Essential Beads For Flow Cytometry Experiments

5 Essential Beads For Flow Cytometry Experiments

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Flow cytometry is designed to measure physical and biochemical characteristics of cells and cell-like particles using fluorescence. Fundamentally, any single-particle suspension (within a defined size range) can pass through the flow cytometer. Beads, for better or worse, are a sine qua non for the flow cytometrist. From quality control,to standardization, to compensation, there is a bead for every job. They are important — critical, even — for flow cytometry.

How To Use Flow Cytometry To Measure Apoptosis, Necrosis, and Autophagy

How To Use Flow Cytometry To Measure Apoptosis, Necrosis, and Autophagy

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Using flow cytometry and a host of different reagents, it is possible to tease out how your cells may have died. Using these tools, you can readily eliminate the various suspects and come to your conclusion as to how your treatment may have killed your cells of interest. Here are some reagents to consider when measuring apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy.

Flow Cytometry Protocols To Prevent Sample Clumping

Flow Cytometry Protocols To Prevent Sample Clumping

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Good flow cytometry depends on a high quality, single cell suspension. If the cells put through the instrument are not of high quality, the ensuing data will be difficult to analyze. Likewise, if the sample is clumpy, one will not be able to readily distinguish cells of interest from the clumps they are attached to. Sample preparation becomes the critical first step in any flow cytometry experiment. To get high quality results, follow these 3 sample preparation steps.

How To Compensate A 4-Color Flow Cytometry Experiment Correctly

How To Compensate A 4-Color Flow Cytometry Experiment Correctly

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

Compensation in flow cytometry is a critical step to ensure accurate interpretation of data. It is also one of the areas that’s steeped in mystery, myths and misinformation. Manually adjusting the compensation values based on how the populations look, or so-called ‘Cowboy Compensation’, is not the correct way to determine proper compensation. The best practices for compensation involve following some very specific rules. Here are 4 steps to correctly compensating 4+ color flow cytometry experiments.

How To Differentiate T-Regulatory Cells (Tregs) By Flow Cytometry

How To Differentiate T-Regulatory Cells (Tregs) By Flow Cytometry

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

T regulatory cells (Tregs), formerly known as T suppressor cells, are a T cell subset with direct roles in both autoimmunity and responses to pathogens. Tregs decrease inflammation via the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines (IL-10, TGF-b) and also through direct suppression of inflammatory effector T cells (such as Th1 and Th17 cells). Given the importance of this unique T cell subset in so many immune responses, many investigators feel remiss if they immunophenotype their cell populations of interest without including a Treg measurement in the mix. But quantifying Tregs can be complicated. This article will show you how to quantify…

How Cell Culture Medium Can Decrease Cell Viability During A Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting Experiment

How Cell Culture Medium Can Decrease Cell Viability During A Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting Experiment

By: Tim Bushnell, PhD

When setting up a cell sorting experiment, there are many things to consider. You must consider which controls you’re going to use, how you’re going to compensate the experiment, which instrument and which instrument settings are ideal, and how you plan to analyze, gate, and present your data. With so many things to consider, it’s easy to lose site of the small things that can drastically affect the viability of your cells, including the composition of your suspension buffer. The composition of the suspension buffer for preparation, staining, analyzing and sorting is perhaps the most important parameter for maintaining viability…

Top Technical Training eBooks

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Get the Advanced Microscopy eBook

Heather Brown-Harding, PhD

Learn the best practices and advanced techniques across the diverse fields of microscopy, including instrumentation, experimental setup, image analysis, figure preparation, and more.

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Get The Free Modern Flow Cytometry eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Learn the best practices of flow cytometry experimentation, data analysis, figure preparation, antibody panel design, instrumentation and more.

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Get The Free 4-10 Compensation eBook

Tim Bushnell, PhD

Advanced 4-10 Color Compensation, Learn strategies for designing advanced antibody compensation panels and how to use your compensation matrix to analyze your experimental data.